Maharashtra: Court docket doesn’t grant anticipatory bail to the accused of concealing his homosexuality from his spouse

Maharashtra (Thane): A courtroom in Maharashtra’s Thane district has rejected the anticipatory bail plea of ​​a 32-year-old Navi Mumbai-based man who allegedly cheated on his spouse by hiding her being homosexual. The person can also be accused of forcing one among his gay companions to go on a honeymoon with himself and his spouse. Extra Periods Choose RS Gupta rejected the bail plea on Tuesday and a duplicate of the order was made obtainable on Friday.

The accused and the complainant (30) had met one another by a social media platform and each had been married in November 2021. the girl police She filed a criticism in U.P. that after marriage she got here to know that her husband is homosexual and got here to know from her personal WhatsApp messages and a few movies in her cell that she was having intercourse with two males from Mumbai. The girl mentioned in her criticism that when she questioned her husband about this, he intimidated her with a knife.

The complainant’s counsel Sagar Kadam informed the courtroom that to be able to impress her earlier than their marriage, the accused confirmed her a faux job letter stating that her wage was Rs 14 lakh each year. Kadam and prosecutor V A Kulkarni submitted that the accused, earlier than marriage, hid the truth that he was gay and thus cheated the complainant and ruined his life.

The investigating officer mentioned that the cellphone dialog (chat) between the accused and his different male accomplices clearly signifies that he’s fascinated with having intercourse with folks of the identical intercourse. The protection counsel opposed the prosecution, saying the allegations had been supposed to defame and harass him and sought reduction.

Dismissing the anticipatory bail plea of ​​the accused, the decide noticed, “Prima facie it seems that the accused supposed to cheat, did fallacious by inflicting monetary loss to the dad and mom of the complainant and inflicting irreparable injury to the lifetime of the complainant and commit fraud.”